OMJOOMSUH Wiki

Shadripus

7 min read

Shadripu

What it is

The Shadripus are the six internal enemies of the human system — the six energetic patterns that, left unaddressed, become the operating system of a life. They are not moral failures, sins, or character flaws in the Western sense. They are vrittis — turbulences in the consciousness — that arise when the discriminating intellect (Buddhi) is overwhelmed by the processing mind (Manas) and conditioned impressions (Samskaras) take the wheel. The six are kama (desire), krodha (anger), lobha (greed), moha (attachment), mada (pride), and matsarya (envy). Together they constitute the diagnostic that explains what the 32 Names of Durga is actually clearing in the morning sadhana, and what the daily Awareness Log in the Morning Mantras app is designed to surface.

Sanskrit / etymology

Shad (षट्) — six. Ripu (रिपु) — enemy, foe. Together: the six enemies.

The Sanskrit framing is deliberate and worth pausing on. The tradition does not call these “weaknesses” or “tendencies.” It calls them enemies — entities with their own intelligence, their own strategies, their own preferred entry points into the human system. To translate them as “negative emotions” is to flatten them. They are forces that, when unmet, actively work against the practitioner’s Dharma.

The six, with etymology:

  • Kama (काम) — desire, craving. From the root kam, “to wish, to long for.” Not desire as such, but the form of desire that has become driven, compulsive, no longer governed by Buddhi.
  • Krodha (क्रोध) — anger, wrath. From the root krudh, “to be inflamed.” The fire that arises when desire is obstructed.
  • Lobha (लोभ) — greed, covetousness. From the root lubh, “to be eager, to covet.” The accumulation impulse that mistakes having for being.
  • Moha (मोह) — attachment, delusion. From the root muh, “to be confused, to lose orientation.” Not attachment to a person or thing as such, but the cognitive fog that mistakes the temporary for the permanent.
  • Mada (मद) — pride, intoxication. From the root mad, “to be drunk, to be exhilarated.” The drunkenness of self-importance — power, position, knowledge, lineage — that obscures perception.
  • Matsarya (मात्सर्य) — envy, jealousy. From matsara, “selfish, jealous.” The pattern of measuring oneself against others such that another’s gain is felt as one’s own loss.

Where it appears in the canon

The Shadripus are foundational across the Sanatan Dharma corpus, though they appear in different vocabularies depending on the text:

  • Bhagavad Gita, Chapter 16, where Krishna enumerates the asuri sampada (demonic qualities) that bind the soul to the lower nature — kama, krodha, lobha are named directly as the “three gates of hell” in 16.21: “Tri-vidham narakasyedam dvaram nashanam atmanah, kamah krodhas tatha lobhas tasmad etat trayam tyajet.” (Three are the gates to this hell that destroy the self — desire, anger, and greed; therefore one should abandon these three.)
  • Yoga Sutras of Patanjali, in the discussion of the kleshas (afflictions) — avidya (ignorance), asmita (egoism), raga (attachment), dvesha (aversion), abhinivesha (clinging to life). The Patanjali kleshas and the Shadripus map onto each other at the root, though the Shadripus are the more behaviourally specific form.
  • Manu Smriti and the Dharma Shastras, where the Shadripus are listed as the primary obstructions to dharmic conduct.
  • Markandeya Purana and the Durga Saptashati, where the demons slain by the Devi are read in the Shakta tradition not as external beings but as personified forms of the Shadripus operating within the practitioner — Madhu and Kaitabha as forms of kama and krodha; Mahishasura as mada; Shumbha and Nishumbha as moha and matsarya.
  • Tantric texts, particularly in the Vama Marga stream, where the Shadripus are mapped to specific Samskaras stored at the level of the causal body and addressed through the clearing function of Shakti.

In the Bihar School of Yoga curriculum, Swami Niranjanananda Saraswati teaches the Shadripus as the primary diagnostic for self-observation — not to be suppressed or judged, but to be witnessed, named, and gradually dissolved through sustained practice.

Why it matters

The Shadripus are the diagnostic that makes the morning sadhana legible as therapy rather than ritual.

They explain what the 32 Names of Durga is actually doing. The 32 Names of Durga is not a generalised invocation of feminine energy. It is a specifically targeted intervention. Each of the 32 names addresses a facet of the clearing function — Durganasini, she who destroys difficulty at its root; Durgamohā, she who bewilders delusion itself; Durgamatsarya-nashini, the conceptual structure underlying the dissolution of envy. The Shadripus are the disease; the 32 Names are the medicine. Without the Shadripus framework, the 32 Names floats. With it, the relationship becomes operational.

They explain what the Awareness Log in the Morning Mantras app is surfacing. The daily prompt — “What challenged your peace today?” — is not a journaling exercise. It is the practitioner being asked to identify which of the six enemies visited that day. Kama arose when scrolling Instagram and the body started to crave. Krodha arose in traffic when someone cut you off. Lobha arose when the colleague got the promotion and your stomach tightened. Moha arose when you defended a position you no longer believed in. Mada arose when you mentioned your lineage to win an argument. Matsarya arose when a friend’s child achieved what your child has not. Naming the visitor is the first act of dissolving its grip.

They explain why the practice is daily and not occasional. The Shadripus do not visit once and depart. They are stored as Samskaras — energetic grooves worn into the psyche by repetition. Each occasion they are met without awareness deepens the groove. Each occasion they are met with awareness — named, witnessed, not acted upon — weakens it. The mathematics of the morning practice is the slow tilting of this ratio over months and years.

They explain why intellect alone cannot defeat them. Gabor Maté, in his work on addiction and the Hungry Ghost, observes that shame cannot be healed by the intellect that was shaped by it. The Vedic tradition arrived at the same observation thousands of years earlier: the Manas that produces the Shadripus cannot dissolve them. Only Buddhi illuminated by Gayatri, and the substrate cleared by Shakti through the 32 Names of Durga, can reach the layer where these patterns actually live.

For the practitioner in the first room of The Four Rooms of Talent — held in place by the trifecta of fear, guilt, and shame — the Shadripus are not abstract concepts. They are the daily report on what holds them there.

Mentioned in

LIST FROM [[Shadripus]]
WHERE type = "essay"

Notes

Future essays could explore: a deeper psychological mapping of each of the six — particularly the relationship between moha and what Western psychology calls cognitive dissonance, and between matsarya and the social comparison loop that social media platforms have industrialised; the gendered face of the Shadripus, and why traditional teaching has emphasised krodha and mada as primary enemies for men, while moha (attachment) and matsarya (envy) often present more centrally for women — and how the morning practice meets both; the relationship between the Shadripus and the four Purusharthas — specifically how a Shadripu, channelled rather than suppressed, becomes the energy that fuels its dharmic counterpart (kama channelled becomes commitment to family; krodha channelled becomes the resolve to stand against adharma; lobha channelled becomes the discipline of yajna); a treatment of the Shadripus through the lens of the Markandeya Purana’s demon symbology — what each demon represents, how each falls, and what the falling teaches.

Graph View

Backlinks